Moderator
1,470
edits
(Added article) |
(Style) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Pinephone article == | == Pinephone article == | ||
=== Required === | === Required === | ||
* The next batch needs to be added to the article (intro, hardware revisions section etc.) | |||
* A proper warning in the introduction section about the state of the software, goal of the project, at which users the phone is marketed towards | |||
* Make the articles ready for BSD and other OSes, too Linux-specific right now | |||
* A support section, directing users towards the community chat in case of issues | |||
* Better structure of the "first time installation" paragraph | |||
* (documentation of the) mainline status of the phone is a big point people could look into | |||
=== Improvements === | === Improvements === | ||
* Battery section doesn't look that good (outdated picture, random lists in the section) | |||
* "Carrier support" overhaul (hard to find, hard to maintain, goals of the section) | |||
* Accessory compatibility in general (especially: hard to maintain, goals of the section/lists, how is it tested, how good is the information quality for readers etc.) | |||
* Software section needs to be updated (for example removal of "What works, what doesn't", style updates, link checks) | |||
* Installation section should be better readable -> graphics, pictures, structure etc. | |||
=== Quality === | === Quality === | ||
* Simplification of the currently used English language | |||
* Some graphical elements such as boxes wouldn't hurt | |||
* Kernel commands to read the sensors, similar to the postmarketOS wiki article (might be too OS-specific for the OS-agnostic wiki -> different variants for different OSes?) | |||
* More mentions of the devs, maybe a dedicated section | |||
=== Long-term goals === | === Long-term goals === | ||
* Good readability | |||
* Nice Graphics | |||
* Article needs to be structured and logical (always important to read it from the eyes of an new user) | |||
* Secondary goal: prevent Pine's support from being drowned with unnecessary support mails if they can also ask in the chat or read the wiki | |||
* Independently of an user reading the wiki or not, the wiki article is likely too complicated. People asking questions in chat = the article needs to be improved |