Difference between revisions of "Talk:PinePhone"
(OS list removal) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
If we try maintain some kind of software list on both the hardware and software pages they are guaranteed to be out of sync at best, and contradictory at worst. IMHO | If we try maintain some kind of software list on both the hardware and software pages they are guaranteed to be out of sync at best, and contradictory at worst. IMHO | ||
===OS list removal=== | |||
As the logo's do not work and the list is very incomplete and adds no extra info, I will remove the OSs list alltogether, and just link to [[PinePhone Software Release]]. The proposal to do this already is from feb, and nobody opposed it.[[User:Abcde|Abcde]] ([[User talk:Abcde|talk]]) 20:49, 24 April 2020 (BST) | |||
Revision as of 19:49, 24 April 2020
In the list of available OSes, it would be helpful to have a bit more information on the less well-known ones. Which major linux distro is Aurora based on? Neon, I seem to remember had something to do with KDE? Is it Debian based? That kind of information. Manjaro is Arch-based, as far as I can tell. As a Debian user, that means I pretty much have to relearn the simplest commands, which is okay!, but it's nice to know that going in. Quixote (talk) 20:43, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
My 6p is this PinePhone (hardware) page should have nothing on software except the link to the software page! And yup, your suggestion to try describe a bit about each option is perfectly at home there.
If we try maintain some kind of software list on both the hardware and software pages they are guaranteed to be out of sync at best, and contradictory at worst. IMHO
OS list removal
As the logo's do not work and the list is very incomplete and adds no extra info, I will remove the OSs list alltogether, and just link to PinePhone Software Release. The proposal to do this already is from feb, and nobody opposed it.Abcde (talk) 20:49, 24 April 2020 (BST)