Difference between revisions of "Talk:PinePhone"
(fixed discussion) |
(link fix) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
== OS list removal == | == OS list removal == | ||
As the logo's do not work and the list is very incomplete and adds no extra info, I will remove the OSs list alltogether, and just link to [[PinePhone Software | As the logo's do not work and the list is very incomplete and adds no extra info, I will remove the OSs list alltogether, and just link to [[PinePhone Software Releases]]. The proposal to do this already is from feb, and nobody opposed it. [[User:Abcde|Abcde]] ([[User talk:Abcde|talk]]) 20:49, 24 April 2020 (BST) |
Revision as of 17:18, 31 December 2020
OS list
In the list of available OSes, it would be helpful to have a bit more information on the less well-known ones. Which major linux distro is Aurora based on? Neon, I seem to remember had something to do with KDE? Is it Debian based? That kind of information. Manjaro is Arch-based, as far as I can tell. As a Debian user, that means I pretty much have to relearn the simplest commands, which is okay!, but it's nice to know that going in. Quixote (talk) 20:43, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- My 6p is this PinePhone (hardware) page should have nothing on software except the link to the software page! And yup, your suggestion to try describe a bit about each option is perfectly at home there.
- If we try maintain some kind of software list on both the hardware and software pages they are guaranteed to be out of sync at best, and contradictory at worst. IMHO --Dukla2000 (talk) 20:51, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
OS list removal
As the logo's do not work and the list is very incomplete and adds no extra info, I will remove the OSs list alltogether, and just link to PinePhone Software Releases. The proposal to do this already is from feb, and nobody opposed it. Abcde (talk) 20:49, 24 April 2020 (BST)