Talk:ROCK64 Software Releases - Revision history

Fxc: +sigs +hl +reply

2023-02-24T19:48:05Z

+sigs +hl +reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:48, 24 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
			== Order ==

	I'm not sure how this 'Discussion' thing (should) work, but the sequence of the OS images seems rather random and is also not consistent with the 'Rock64' page itself.		I'm not sure how this 'Discussion' thing (should) work, but the sequence of the OS images seems rather random and is also not consistent with the 'Rock64' page itself.
	Should that be fixed? And if so, how?		Should that be fixed? And if so, how? --[[User:Diederik\|Diederik]] ([[User talk:Diederik\|talk]]) 22:11, 28 April 2022‎ (UTC)

			: Should be fine now at this point. --[[User:Fxc\|Fxc]] ([[User talk:Fxc\|talk]]) 19:48, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

	== Working OS's (almost) ==		== Working OS's (almost) ==

	After trying the Manjaro 22.06 versions using various desktops that broke the HDMI output when updates were installed, I had high hopes when I discovered the latest iteration 23.02. Unfortunately it broke the HDMI just like it's predisessor. I made comments on the Manjaro forum about it, to no avail. I didn't write a bug report on Git, I don't know how nor do I have time to learn at this time. This is an example of the "half baked" supported OS's I see people on line refering to.		After trying the Manjaro 22.06 versions using various desktops that broke the HDMI output when updates were installed, I had high hopes when I discovered the latest iteration 23.02. Unfortunately it broke the HDMI just like it's predisessor. I made comments on the Manjaro forum about it, to no avail. I didn't write a bug report on Git, I don't know how nor do I have time to learn at this time. This is an example of the "half baked" supported OS's I see people on line refering to.--[[User:Flagtrax\|Flagtrax]] ([[User talk:Flagtrax\|talk]]) 18:21, 24 February 2023‎ (UTC)

			: Their forums and the wiki discussion page is really the wrong place for this. The correct place is their bug tracker, reporting bugs really isn't hard. In software development, the hourly rate is often in the three digits. I can understand that you don't have time but why do you expect other people to have time and fix your bugs (you don't even report properly) in their free time? This doesn't add up. --[[User:Fxc\|Fxc]] ([[User talk:Fxc\|talk]]) 19:48, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Flagtrax: /* Working OS's (almost) */ new section

2023-02-24T18:21:34Z

Working OS's (almost): new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:21, 24 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I'm not sure how this 'Discussion' thing (should) work, but the sequence of the OS images seems rather random and is also not consistent with the 'Rock64' page itself.		I'm not sure how this 'Discussion' thing (should) work, but the sequence of the OS images seems rather random and is also not consistent with the 'Rock64' page itself.
	Should that be fixed? And if so, how?		Should that be fixed? And if so, how?

			== Working OS's (almost) ==

			After trying the Manjaro 22.06 versions using various desktops that broke the HDMI output when updates were installed, I had high hopes when I discovered the latest iteration 23.02. Unfortunately it broke the HDMI just like it's predisessor. I made comments on the Manjaro forum about it, to no avail. I didn't write a bug report on Git, I don't know how nor do I have time to learn at this time. This is an example of the "half baked" supported OS's I see people on line refering to.

Diederik: Start discussion on the sequence of OS images, which seems random and inconsistent with the Rock64 page

2022-04-28T22:11:27Z

Start discussion on the sequence of OS images, which seems random and inconsistent with the Rock64 page

New page

I'm not sure how this 'Discussion' thing (should) work, but the sequence of the OS images seems rather random and is also not consistent with the 'Rock64' page itself.
Should that be fixed? And if so, how?